Using Tails OS with Persistence, Tor, PGP and Pidgin

Bismillahir-Rahmanir-Raheem

Ansar Al-Khilafah Technical Team Presents:

Using Tails OS with Persistence, Tor, PGP and Pidgin – A Two-Part Video

Learn how to use Tails OS and remain anonymous over the internet while leaving no traces of your activity on your PC or Laptop. Learn how to make your activity on your computer forensic-proof, so that if your computer is ever examined, there is no trace of what you did, thereby stopping you from getting into trouble.

Many people have got into trouble because of what they said, however, what got them into real trouble is what was found on their computers, including compromising data, and traces of their internet and reading activities. Learn how to protect yourself from these dangers with this comprehensive guide!

Part 1 of 2:

 

Part 2 of 2:

Treatise regarding the Third Nullifier from the Nullifiers of Islam – Sh. Maisarah al-Muhajir

CiOGASTWEAAE3NS

Download PDF -> Here

 

Treatise regarding the Third Nullifier from the Nullifiers of Islam

Penned by: Maisarah al-Muhajir (May Allah preserve him)

Translated by Ansar al-Khilafah

In the Name of Allah, the Most Merciful and the Most Compassionate

Indeed all Praise belongs to Allah, the Wali[1] of the Pious. May the blessings and peace be upon the best of the Messengers, our Prophet Muhammad, upon him and his family and companions – the best of blessings and the most complete of peace. As for what follows:

[This is a] “Treatise regarding the Third Nullifier from the Nullifiers of Islam” which was mentioned by the Imam al-Mujadid ash-Shaykh Muhammad bin ‘Abdul Wahhab – may Allah have mercy on him – I ask Allah the most High to make it sincerely for his generous countenance, and to make it beneficial.

And I say, while I seek Allah’s aid:

ash-Shaykh al-Mujadid Muhammad bin ‘Abdul Wahhab – may Allah have mercy on him – said:

The Third Nullifier: (Whoever who doesn’t make Takfeer on the Polytheists, or doubts about their disbelief, or validates their methodology, such is a Disbeliever);

This is a rule that is agreed upon by the Scholars. However it is not in its absolute sense.

This is because viewing it to be absolute results in: Takfeer of the Muslims who do not understand the principle of ‘Excuse under the pretext Ignorance’ regarding the Takfeer of the Polytheists who are associated to Islam.

Indeed the Scholars have divided this Nullifier into two sections: Aslee Mushrik[2] (Original Polytheists), and Polytheists who are associated [to Islam][3].

As for the Original Polytheists: Whoever who doesn’t make Takfeer on them or doubts about their Disbelief, or validates their Methodology; such is a Disbeliever by Ijma’.

After narrating in ash-Shifa [2/270-271] from al-Jahith and Thumamah who claimed that Allah has no Hujja[4] against many of the commoners, women, fools, and blind-followers of Jews & Christians and other besides them, because they didn’t have a disposition by which citations can be possible with, Al-Qadi Iyad said [responding to this]: … and the one who says all of this, is a disbeliever by way of Ijma’ (consensus) upon the disbelief of one who doesn’t make Takfeer on any of the Chrisitans and Jews”

And ash-Shaykh Abdullah Abu Bateen – may Allah have mercy on him – said: “And the Muslims have agreed upon the Disbelief of one who doesn’t make Takfeer of the Jews and Christians, or doubts regarding their disbelief. And we are certain that many of them are Ignorant.” [ad-Durar as-Saniyyah 12/69]

This is because the disbelief of these people: is known by necessity from the religion of Islam. The commoners nor the Scholars are ignorant of it. Rather, Islam of a person is not valid till he believes the falseness of every religion that is contrary to the religion of Islam – like Judaism, Christianity, Zoroastrian and others besides them from the false religions.

Allah the Most High said: { And whoever desires other than Islam as religion never will it be accepted from him, and he, in the Hereafter, will be among the losers }[5]. And not making Takfeer on this type: is rejecting the texts of the Qur’an, Sunnah, and the Ijma’ of the Ummah. And it constitutes not actualizing disbelief in the Taghut (all false deities collectively]. Allah the Most High says:

{Whoever disbelieves in Taghut and believes in Allah, then he has grasped the most trustworthy handhold]

And the Messenger of Allah – blessings of Allah and peace be upon him – said: “Whoever who says Laa ilaaha illa laah [There is no god except Allah], and disbelieves in whatever that is worshiped besides Allah, his property and his blood is sacred, and his accountability is upon Allah.” Narrated by Muslim.

And it is necessitated[6] from viewing their worship to be false: the falsehood of those who worship them, and making Takfeer on them, and if you do not make Takfeer on them, then you have not taken hold of the most trustworthy handhold. And Allah commanded the messenger – blessings of Allah and peace be upon him – to say to the disbelievers of Quraysh: {Say (O’ Muhammad): O’ Disbelievers}. And Allah didn’t command his Messenger – blessing of Allah and peace be upon him – another belief besides that. And this is because disbelieving in the Taghut has pillars. And if one of these fall, the rest falls. As for when their methodology is validated or doubted on: Then all of these pillars fall. This is because the way of disbelieving in the Taghut is achieved with five things. These were mentioned by ash-Shaykh Muhamad bin ‘Abdul bin Abdul Wahhab – may Allah have mercy on him – in a separate treatise. And they are: Believing in the falseness of worshiping others besides Allah. Leaving these [Taghuts] for those who are mixed in it, hating it [the Taghuts], and making Takfeer of those who worship it, and showing enmity towards those who worship it based on the ability and capacity. These five are not attained by one who validates their methodology or doubts regarding them. And all of these are pillars except for the fifth (Showing enmity); this is because it is connected to ability and capacity to do. As for one who doesn’t make Takfeer on them thinking that the Evidence has not been established upon them; then such is belying the texts and consensus (Ijma’) like we have mentioned.

As for the Second Type: Then they are the polytheist who are associated to the Millah of Islam. As for these, those who do not make Takfeer on them: They are not made Takfeer of in the beginning. This is because the reason for the verdict of disbelief of those who do not make Takfeer on these is based on: Rejection of the Texts (Qur’an and Sunnah), and rejection of al-Ijma’ (consensus) upon the one who commits Shirk is a Polytheist according to the Qur’an, Sunnah and Ijma’. However it is necessary for us to know that the matter of making Takfeer on a Disbeliever associated to Islam: is from the Indistinct Matters that require the Establishment of Hujja.

And this is what the Scholars of Najd and at the top of them is al-Imam al-Mujadid ash-Shaykh Muhammad bin ‘Abdul Wahhab – may Allah have mercy on him – understood in this matter. This is even with the reality that these scholars are actually in need of what can be used as evidence for their views, and have not used as evidence themselves, because the source in all of this is the Qur’an and Sunnah.

However this is a refutation against what is being shown citation for, using their statements.

And here are some of their sayings, with a short explanation on it; for the sake of increasing its clarity.

Ash-Shaykh Muhammad bin ‘Abdul Wahhab, and his grandson ‘Abdur Rahman bin Hassan – may Allah have mercy on them both – said: “And from them are those who took them as enemies but didn’t make Takfeer of them. Such a person has also not come with what is evidenced by Laa ilaaha illa laah (There is no God except Allah) regarding denying Shirk, and what it constitutes of in making Takfeer on those who do it after explaining according to Ijma’.” [ad-Durar as-Saniyyah 2/207]

Look at how they made Takfeer on such a person after explaining, and if it were that a person who did not make Takfeer on the Polytheists associated to [Islam] is a disbeliever if he doesn’t make Takfeer on them absolutely : they would not have said ‘after explaining’.

And Sulaiman bin ‘Abdullah – grandson of ash-Shaykh Muhammad bin ‘Abdul Wahhab – may Allah have mercy on them both said – regarding one who didn’t make Takfeer on the Polytheists: “And if he was doubtful about their disbelief, or ignorant of their disbelief, then the evidence from the book of Allah, and the Sunnah of His Messenger is explained to him regarding their disbelief. And if he doubts after that and is hesitant after that, then such is a disbeliever by consensus (Ijma’) of the Scholars regarding one who doubts about the disbelief of a disbeliever being a disbeliever.” [awthaq ‘Ura al-Eeman / Majmu’at Tawheed]

His saying: “then the evidence from the book of Allah, and the Sunnah of His Messenger is explained to him”: is an evidence upon establishing the Hujja, and if it was not like that, they would have indeed been disbelievers before the explanation. And if the Hujja is established: He has disbelieved by Ijma’. Thereafter he said: “regarding one who doubts about the disbelief of a disbeliever being a disbeliever.” And this is an evidence for the fact that when this rule is about one who is associated to [Islam] : it is necessary to explain.

And ash-Shaykh Muhammad bin ‘Abdul Lateef Aal-Shaykh – may Allah have mercy on them all – said: “Know that these (polytheistic) action are from the religion of Jahiliyyah (Ignorance), which the Messenger of Allah – blessings of Allah and peace be upon him – was sent with to disavow from and remove, and erase its remnants, because they are from Major Shirk, which the Muhkam (Clear) Aayat provide evidence for its impermissibility. And these festivals are similar to the festivals of al-Jahiliyyah. And whoever who believes in its permissibility and legality, and that it is a worship and a religion: Such is from the most disbelieving from the creations of Allah, and their most misguided. And whoever who doubts regarding their disbelief after establishing the Hujja upon them: Such is a disbeliever.” [ad-Durar as-Saniyyah 10/440]

Look at his saying: “And whoever who doubts regarding their disbelief after establishing the Hujja upon them: Such is a disbeliever.”

And he said in another place:One who allocates some places for his worship or believers that the obligation of Hajj falls from one who stands at these places, such a person’s disbelief is not doubted by those who have smelt the scent of Islam. And one who doubts regarding his disbelief, then it is necessary to establish the Hujja upon him, and explain to him that this is Disbelief and Shirk, and that taking these stones is making it equal to the Signs of Allah which Allah has made standing upon to be a worship to Allah. And if the Hujja is established upon him and he still persists, then there is no doubt regarding his disbelief” [ad-Durar as-Saniyyah 10/440]

And this is after he had previously said that: “Such is from the most disbelieving from the creations of Allah, and their most misguided”. And if it was that one who doesn’t make Takfeer of the Polytheists associated [to Islam] disbelieved absolutely: He would not have said ‘after Establishing the Hujja’.

And look at his saying: “And one who doubts regarding his disbelief, then it is necessary to establish the Hujja upon him, and explain to him that this is Disbelief and Shirk” till he said: “And if the Hujja is established upon him and he still persists, then there is no doubt regarding his disbelief.”

And ash-Shaykh Ishaq bin ‘Abdur Rahman bin Hassan – may Allah have mercy on them all – said: “And upon examination: They do not make Takfeer of the Polytheist except generally. And from them are those abstain from that, and they alienated it and it became alienated from them due to what they brought from the Shubuhah (doubts), thereafter their innovation and doubts crept on till it circulated [even] among the closest brothers” [Takfeer al-Mu’ayyan]

Look at how he named them the closest brothers, even when they do not make Takfeer on the Polytheists.

ash-Shaykh Sulaiman bin Sahman – may Allah have mercy on him – said:

“And thereafter, if it were decreed that a person from the scholars had stopped short from viewing the Kufr of a person from the ignorant blind followers of al-Jahmiyyiah or the ignorant blind followers of the Grave Worshipers, it would definitely be possible for us to excuse him regarding that, because he is excusably mistaken. And we do not say that he is a disbeliever because he is not safe from Mistakes, and the Ijma’ regarding that is certain.[7] And it is necessary for him to make a blunder because those who are better than him have made errors …

And Shaykh al-Islam [ibn Taymiyyah rahimahullah] have said in [Raf’ al-Malaam ‘an Ai’mah al-A’laam] ten reasons why they are excused due to errors and mistakes that they have made who are Mujtahideen. As for making Takfeer on him, I mean upon the one who made the mistake and the one who made the blunder; then it is from the lies and false compulsions. This is because no one from the Scholars made Takfeer on anyone for stopping short of making Takfeer, on anyone because of any reason from the reasons, by which the Scholar is excused of if he is mistaken, wherein the evidence has not been established upon him regarding the disbelief of a person whom the description which if manifested in a person makes him a disbeliever with that description. On the contrary, if it is explained to him [the Scholar], and thereafter he opposed it and rejected it stubbornly and persisted [then he falls into kufr].

And due to this, when a group of the Sahabah and the Tabi’een like Qudamah bin Mazoon and his companions drank wine, and thought that it was allowed for those who did righteous deeds according to what they understood from the Aayah in Surah al-Ma’ida: The Scholars from the Sahabah like ‘Umar, ‘Ali and others besides them agreed that they should be asked to repent (Istitabah). And if they persisted upon making it permissible: Then they would make Takfeer on them. And if they attested to its impermissibility: then they would be whipped. So they [the Scholars from the Sahabah] didn’t make Takfeer on the ones [who made wine permissible] due to their permitting it at first; due to the doubt that was presented to them, till the Haqq was explained to them, and if they persisted upon rejecting, they would have been made Takfeer on.

But due to the Ignorance and lack of knowledge which the Muhaqiqeen are upon: it has thrown you into unreasonable excess/recklessness regarding the view without a Hujja or an evidence, with false ilzaamaats (Compulsions), and broken down ignorance. And this path was from the paths of the people of Innovation (Bid’ah), and this composition was woven upon their pattern[8] with concealment and faulty reasoning. And this is not the correct way of doing things.[9]

End Quote. [Kashf al-Awhaam wa al-Iltibaas, ‘an Tashbeeh ba’d al-Aghbiya’ min an-Naas, p16]

Look at his statement regarding not making Takfeer of one who doesn’t make Takfeer on the Blind followers of the Grave Worshipers. And look at his saying: “because he is excusably mistaken.” And his saying: “and the Ijma’ regarding that is certain.” And also look at his saying: “As for making Takfeer on him, I mean upon the one who made the mistake and the one who made the blunder; then it is from the lies and false compulsions. This is because no one from the Scholars made Takfeer on anyone for stopping short of making Takfeer on anyone because of any reason from the reasons, by which the Scholar is excused of if he is mistaken, wherein the evidence has not been established upon him regarding the disbelief of a person whom the description which if manifested in a person makes him a disbeliever with that description.”. So he has considered that from the lies, and false compulsions, and he conveyed from the scholars that the one who falls into that is not made Takfeer on; “Takfeer of the one who excuses the Mushrik associated to the Millah of Islam”, and he has mentioned that Ignorance in not understanding what the Muhaqiqoon (Researchers) are upon would throw you into recklessness regarding the view without any Hujja, and that it is indeed from the paths of the people of Innovation (Bid’ah).

And we suffice with these statements, and if we were to probe all of the views of the Scholars, it would have indeed lengthened. Rather the intention was to refute those who are using their Mutashaabih (unclear/alike) statements as citations, and generalized it without identifying the rules in the Issue. And if the Mutashaabih from their statements were brought to their Muhkam (clear) statements, these blunders would not have been made, rather they would have been saved from this confusion.

And from what we have mentioned it has become clear: that Takfeer of the Polytheists associated to the Millah of Islam, is from the indistinct matters which may be indistinct to the commoners and [even] the scholars, rather even some of the new scholars have not determined precisely the matter of ‘Udhur bil Jahl’ (Excuse under pretext of Ignorance).

‘So it necessitates making Takfeer on them, because it is a clear matter’ according to their claim. Otherwise they are disbelievers for dispossessing their Asl (Fundamental)[10], and likewise they have to make Takfeer of the A’imah of Da’wah (Najdi Da’wah Scholars), because they have not made takfeer on those who didn’t make Takfeer on the Polytheists or doubted regarding their Disbelief. So think about that, and look into it again before you are misguided and cause others to be misguided.

I ask Allah to bestow upon us beneficial knowledge, and good deeds. Indeed he is the capable one upon that.

And may the blessings of Allah be upon our Prophet Muhammad, and upon his family and all of his companions.

Written by: Maysarah al-Muhajir

21 Shawwal 1435H

17 August 2014


[1]  Wali in language refers to a Guardian/Protector/Ally

[2]  Polytheists who have not uttered Shahadah and are not associated to Islam

[3]   Polytheists who have uttered Islam, and have outward actions of Islam mixed with Shirk.

[4]  Hujja can be translated as evidence or Proof or similar.

[5]  Surah al-Imran 3:85

[6]  The word here is Laazim which means necessitates.

[7]  The Ijma’ regarding not making Takfeer on one who doesn’t make Takfeer on another due to Mistakes.

[8]  i.e. the pattern of their predecessors from the people of Bid’ah

[9]   In Arabic text, it is : (ما هكذا تورد الإبل) – The literal translation here would be: “And this is not the way ‘O Sa’d, how you lead the Camel”. It is an Arabic proverb used to say that this is not the correct way of doing something.

[10]   The Aslu Deen according to them.

 

The talk regarding the Third Nullifier – a light on the matter

 

test

In the Name of Allah, the Most Merciful, the Most Compassionate.

It has come to the attention of Ansarul Khilafah Media that a lot of people are talking about a branch from the Third Nullifier in excessive detail which are matters reserved for those deeply rooted in Knowledge of Islam from the Ummah, and that they are going into details without any knowledge, or background on it, and wasting their time arguing amongst themselves regarding its consequences without even knowing the stance of Dawlatul Khilafah al-Islamiyyah on the topic. And so as to shed light on to the topic we present to you the translated section of the Aqeedah notes from the Islamic State Military Camp regarding the details of the third Nullifier for the benefit of the truth seekers.

Know dear readers, may Allah have mercy on you all, that the methodology of the Islamic State is based on the views presented in the Qur’an, Sunnah and the Salaf of the Ummah. And this is further consolidated when they have referred it back to the views of the A’imah of Najd as would be clear from the following translation.  As for those who claim it is against the views of the Najdi Scholars, they have reason to doubt their own stances on it, and also regarding their own selves because the Islamic State has presented their view on it with quotations from Najdi Scholars themselves.

We ask Allah to elevate the tribulations of our times and to give victory to the Islamic State and guide the Ummah and unite it under one banner.

Without further ado, we present to you:

From the Islamic State Military Camp Notes

Aqeedah Notes:

The Third Nullifier:

Whoever who doesn’t make Takfeer of the Polytheists or doubts about their Kufr or validates their Methodology

The Matter of one who doesn’t make Takfeer of the Disbeliever, or doubts about his disbelief, requires one to know with the details of this rule exactly before giving its verdict upon one who is characterized by it. And that is by knowing the types of Kufr. And that is also by knowing who are the disbelievers – wherein one who refrains from making Takfeer on them or doubts about their disbelief – are made Takfeer on.

And indeed, the Scholars (may Allah have mercy on them all) have stated that one who doesn’t make Takfeer on the Kafir or doubts about his Kufr, then such has indeed disbelieved. And they have stated that this is not absolute, rather, indeed the matter has details. And one who doesn’t learn the rules of this Nullifier is lead, by his misunderstanding, to chained (consequential) Takfeer.

  • One who doesn’t make Takfeer of the Disbeliever, such person may not know the situation of the disbeliever. This is like one who may not know that a person from the people has uttered a saying of disbelief, or did an act which is an act of disbelief. Such a person is excused and doesn’t enter in to this nullifier. And this is what is known as Ignorance of the situation (Jahl al-Haal)
  • And if he knows the situation of the disbeliever, then he is judged based on the Disbeliever he didn’t make Takfeer on, or doubted about the disbelief of or validated the methodology of.

The Disbeliever in short is of two categories:

The First: The Original Disbeliever (or the Kaafir al-Asli) :

And they are those who are not attributed to the Millah of Islam, nor have they uttered the Shahadatain, like the Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians (Majus), the Hindus and others besides them.

As for the one who doesn’t make Takfeer on them or doubts about their disbelief, he has disbelieved. This is because their disbelief is specified in the Qur’a and Sunnah, and is known from the religion of Islam by necessity. So one who doesn’t make Takfeer on these, either is belying the Qur’an and Sunnah, or is one who doesn’t know the foundation of Islam and its reality. And such a person’s Islam is not valid because he has left a pillar from the pillars of the Kalimah (There is no God But Allah لا إله إلا الله – ) and that [pillar] is disbelief in the Taghut (all false dieties collectively).

Al-‘Allamah ‘Abdullah Aba Bateen (may Allah have mercy on him) said: “The Muslims have agreed upon the disbelief of one who doesn’t make Takfeer of the Jews and the Christians, or doubts about their disbelief. And we are certain that their majority are Ignorant” [Risaalah al-Intisaar]

The Second: The Disbeliever who is attributed to Islam.

And he is one who has spoken the Shadatain. However he has committed a deed that constitutes Kufr which puts him out of the domain of Islam.

And these vary in their disbelief with regards to its clarity and its concealment (lack of clarity) to different categories:

  1. One whose disbelief is clearly evident, which is cited from the clear text of the Qur’an and Sunnah – like the Polytheists (Mushrikeen) who call upon and worship others besides Allah. These people, their acts are contradictory to the foundation of the Kalimah of Tawheed and is it’s opposite in every way. And those who do not make Takfeer of them fall to either of two situations :
  • Either he see that the action of these people to be correct, and he agrees with them upon it. Such a person is a disbeliever like them even if he doesn’t commit Shirk (associate others with Allah) himself. This is because he has validated and agreed with the act of Shirk And this is disbelief. And we seek protection in Allah from such!
  • Or it is that they say that this act of theirs is disbelief and Shirk. However he doesn’t make Takfeer of them by Ta’weel (interpreting Shar’i texts) and excusing them in the pretext of Ignorance (jahl). Such a person doesn’t disbelieve because he has not validated or agreed upon their act, however the doubt of excusing them in the pretext of Ignorance has been exhibited/presented to him. Such a person is not made Takfeer on due to the doubt that has exhibited to him. And if the execution of Hudud (capital punishments) are held off due to doubts, then it is more befitting in Takfeer. And one whose Islam is ascertained with certainty doesn’t leave it except with certainty. And Ta’weel (interpretation of texts) – regarding excusing them in the pretext of Ignorance – prevents making Takfeer [upon him] in the first place till the texts are explained to him [that there is no excuse in these matters], and the doubt is raised from him. And if he doesn’t make Takfeer of them after that, then he has disbelieved.

Al-‘Allamah Sulaiman bn Abdullah said regarding those who stop short of or doubts or is ignorant of the disbelief of the Qubooree’s : “And if he was doubtful about their disbelief, or ignorant of their disbelief, then the evidence from the book of Allah, and the Sunnah of His Messenger is explained to him regarding their disbelief. And if he doubts after that and is hesitant after that, then such is a disbeliever by consensus (Ijma’) of the Scholars regarding one who doubts about the disbelief of a disbeliever being a disbeliever.” [awthaq ‘Ura al-Eeman Dimn Majmoo’at at-Tawheed 1/160]

Ash-Shaykh Muhammad bin ‘Abdul Lateef aal-Shaykh – may Allah have mercy on him – said: “One who allocates some places for his worship or believers that the obligation of Hajj falls from one who stands at these places, such a person’s disbelief is not doubted by those who have smelt the scent of Islam. And one who doubts regarding his disbelief, then it is necessary to Establish the Evidence upon him, and explain to him that this is Disbelief and Shirk, and that taking these stones is making it equal to the Signs of Allah which Allah has made standing upon to be a worship to Allah. And if the evidence is established upon him and he still persists, then there is no doubt regarding his disbelief.” [ad-Durar as-Saniyyah : 10/443]

  1. Doubt being anticipated about the Takfeer of this type of person. And that is like the rulers who rule by other than what Allah has revealed or their likes. These people, even if their disbelief is absolutely certain with those who have researched the matter, but due to the possibility of arrival of doubts, one who doesn’t make Takfeer on them is not made Takfeer of, except after establishing the Evidence upon such, with uncovering the doubt & removing it from him, and after he knows that the Hukum (verdict) of Allah regarding these people are making Takfeer on them.
  2. The Takfeer of a person whose Takfeer is an Ijtihadi Issue wherein there is a difference of opinion between Muslims regarding it. Like the verdict of one who abandons as-Salah or its like. Indeed, in such matters likes these, the one who refrains from making Takfeer on one who commits it is not made takfeer of. Rather, he is not even deemed an innovator as long as his fundamentals are the fundamentals of ahlu as-Sunnah wa al-Jama’ah.
-END-

Muhammad bin Salmaan and the return of Idolatry to the Arabian Peninsula

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

[ Haqq Media Translations ]

 

Al-Battar Media

Presents

11_-_copy

Muhammad bin Salmaan and the return of Idolatry to the Arabian Peninsula

 

In the Name of Allah, the Most Merciful, the Most Compassionate

 

All praise belongs to Allah alone, and may the blessings and peace be upon our prophet Muhammad, his family and his companions.

Allah the Most High said: {and I didn’t create the Jinn and Mankind except to worship me}

Allah the Most High sent his messengers and revealed the books so that he would be worshipped alone with no partners. And Islam was established upon belief in Allah and disbelief in the Taghut. Allah the Most High said : { Whoever disbelieves in Taghut and believes in Allah, then he has grasped the most trustworthy handhold that will never break.}

Shaykhul Islam Muhammad bin ‘Abdul Wahhab – may Allah have mercy on him – said: “Know this, may Allah have mercy on you, that the thing that was first obligated by Allah upon the son of Adam is disbelief in the Taghut and Belief in Allah” End Quote.

Indeed, Islam has come with the [command] of destroying the Idols and statues, and with the establishment of Tawheed by worshiping Allah alone without any partners. And this is why the Prophet Muhammad – blessings of Allah and peace be upn him – came with the destruction of the Idols, so that the worship would be for Allah alone without no partners in it. It has come in the famous Hadith of ‘Amru bin ‘Abasa who said:

I used to think when I was in Jahiliyyah that the people were upon misguidance, and that they were not upon anything and that they were worshipping Idols. And I heard of a man in Makkah who was giving news of things, so I travelled and went to him, and there he was the Messenger of Allah – blessings of Allah and peace be upon him – in hiding with his people against him, so I was quiet till I entered upon him in Makkah. So I said to him: ‘What are you?’ He said: ‘I am a prophet.’ So I asked: ‘and what is a prophet?’ He said: ‘I was sent by Allah.’ So I asked: ‘And with what were you sent?’ He said: ‘I was sent [to order] to maintain the relations of the womb, to break the Idols and to make Allah one and not associate anything with him.’

Shaykhul Islam Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab – May Allah have mercy on him – says: “The cream of the divine Message and the Prophetic call is Unification (Tawheed) of Allah in worshipping him, alone, with no partners, and to break the Idols. And it is known that breaking them [i.e. the idols] would not be achieved except with severe enmity and by drawing the sword. So ponder about the cream of the Message.” End Quote.

In an interview of the Defence Minister of Saudi – who is also its Deputy Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salmaan – with the TV channel al-‘Arabiyyah, he said : “Many people connect the history of the Arabian Peninsula with a very short history. Indeed it is, by Allah, their history of 1400 years only, which is connected to the Islamic History. Whereas, the Islamic History, and there is no doubt that it is the most important support and stepping-stone for us, however we have a very voluminous historical depth which meets with many civilizations. The Arabian History is thousands of years old. It is a history of speech. A history of principles. A history of values which cannot be matched by any other History or civilization in the World. The best civilisation in terms of values and principles – it is the Arabian Civilisation which has existed for thousands of years. This is one thing that we have. Second [thing we have is], we have a part of the European Civilisation present inside Saudi and it has extremely important places in Saudi and it has a component of civilization that is very important inside Saudi. And we have important destroyed civilisations which existed for thousands of years which are deeper [historically] than any other civilisation. This is a part of the map of Civilisation that is present in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It is an obligation for us to benefit from these civilisations and make use of it in one way or the other”. End Quote.

Like this he had said – and we seek refuge from Allah from the Misguidance.

Muhammad bin Salman is praising the Arabian Civilisation that existed before Islam. The civilization of worshipping Idols and associating others with Allah, and he describes that the best civilization in terms of values and principles is the Arabian Civilisation

Which values and principles are there in worshipping the Idols and in committing Shirk (taking partners) with Allah – which ‘Amru bin Luhai brought to the Arabian Peninsula – that Muhammad bin Salman praises in those civilization according to his statement?

Rather, he is talking about destroyed civilisations and he wishes to restore them. So does he intend by these civilisations, the polytheistic disbelieving nations like ‘Aad and Thamud and others besides them from the Nations that Allah the Most High punished?

And the amazing thing is when he says: “It is an obligation for us to benefit from these civilisations and make use of it in one way or the other” !!

So what does he intend by that? Does it mean the return of Idolatry to the Arabian Peninsula upon the hands of this man? And would he be the new ‘Amru bin Luhai who would put the people into the fitna of the civilizations of Idol worshipping and committing shirk with Allah?

Rather, he didn’t stop at the Arabian Idolatry, he even spoke about what he called the European Civilisation when he said: “we have a part of the European Civilisation present inside Saudi and it has extremely important places in Saudi and it has a component of civilization that is very important inside Saudi.”

So does he want a return of the European Idolatry like how he wishes for the return of the Arabian Idolatry – we seek refuge in Allah!

Indeed, the position of Islam is clear and there is no confusion in it regarding the obligation of destroying Idolatry and putting an end to it. For Islam and Shirk will never ever exist together.

‘Ali bin Abi Talib – may Allah be pleased with him – said to Abu al-Hayyaj al-Asadi : “Shall I not send you with what the Messenger of Allah – blessings of Allah and peace be upon him – sent me with, that you would not leave a representation (an idol) except that you disfigure it, nor a raised grave except that you level it?”. End Quote.

This is what our prophet Muhammad – blessings of Allah and peace be upon him – was sent with. Disfiguring the Idols, and levelling the raised graves! And it is not like how Muhammad bin Salman wants in reviving the ancient Idolatry in the name of Ancient Arabian Civilisation!

Rather, the scholars of Islam have established the obligation of destroying places of Shirk and Idolatry and established that it is not permissible for these places to remain even for one day with the capability [to destroy them].

Ibn Qayyim – may Allah have mercy on him – said: “It is not permissible for the places of Shirk and the Tawaqheet, after the capability to destroy it and falsifying it – to be kept [without destroying] even for a single day. This is because they are slogans of disbelief and Shirk, and they are the worst of evil. So it is not permissible to agree upon these [by not destroying them and keeping them] with the capability [to destroy them] at all.” End Quote.

And even with this dirty criminal call for a return of Idolatry to the Arabian Peninsula, you do not find even a single word from the evil scholars regarding it!

So where are those who attacked the Islamic State day and night and described it deceitfully with every blemish, where are they now regarding this dirty call for the return of Idolatry to the Arabian Peninsula?!

Where is the dirty man, Sa’d ash-Shithry who described the State of Islam and its soldiers to be Heretics!!

Where are the dirty Suruiyah regarding this matter?!

Where is their drunkard who lies upon the Islamic State, where is he regarding this matter?!

Indeed Shirk was wide-spread in the Islamic World when the Imam al-Mujadid Shaykhul Islam and the Imam of Ahlu Sunnah Muhammad bin ‘Abdul Wahhab – may Allah have mercy on him – stood with his call, fought Shirk and spread Tawheed – him and his grandsons, using the tongue and the swords.

The Official Maktabatul Himmah (Publisher) that is under the Islamic State had mentioned in the Introduction of Mufeed al-Mustafeed by Shaykh Muhammad bin ‘Abdul Wahhab – may Allah have mercy on him:

“And ash-Shaykh Muhammad fought all types of Shirk, Bid’ah and Superstitions inside the Arabian Peninsula and outside it. And he waged Jihad against everyone who stood in front of the call of Tawheed. So he gathered in himself Tawheed and Jihad, by which he became the Imam of his Era. Allah purified the lands upon his hands, from the Shirk which many of the Muslims of that time had fallen into. And Allah – the most Glorified – renewed Tawheed that was worn out. And he is whom we consider that the saying of the truthful and the attested one – the blessings of Allah and his peace be upon him – applies to [wherein he said]: ‘Indeed Allah the Most High sends a person for this Ummah at the beginning of every hundred years who would renew its religion for it.’.” End Quote.

And now, Muhammad bin Salman announces the return of Idolatry – we seek refuge in Allah!

And after this clear statement, now it is clear who is giving victory to Tawheed and destroying Shirk, and who is calling for the renewal of Idolatry.

The matters have become clear, and it is clear that in reality it is the Islamic State that is carrying the banner of Tawheed in this age with honesty. And that it is the real continuance of the call of Tawheed and the call of the Prophets upon the Prophetic Methodology. [Which was] the Call of the leaders of Guidance like Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal, Shaykhul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah and Shaykhul Islam Muhammad bin ‘Abdul Wahhab – may Allah have mercy on them all.

The Official Maktabatul Himmah that is under the Islamic State had mentioned in the Introduction of Mufeed al-Mustafeed by Shaykh Muhammad bin ‘Abdul Wahhab – may Allah have mercy on him:

“And we thank Allah – the Most Glorified – for honouring us by allowing us to distribute what ash-Shaykh Muhammad renewed from the Aqeedah of Tawheed which the Tawaqheet and their adherents are warring against by labelling it Wahhabiyyah, Takfeeriyyah and Khawaarij, ever since its first inception till our current time. But how can they ever extinguish the light of Tawheed, when Islam has attained a state upon the prophetic methodology which safeguards the limits of Tawheed and protects its Da’ees”. End Quote.

It has indeed become clear now who are the real inheritors of the da’wah of Shaykhul Islam Muhammad bin ‘Abdul Wahhab and his grandsons.

It is indeed the Islamic State which is spreading Tawheed and waging Jihad to spread it and it is not Saudi nor the evil monks nor the dogs of Sururiyyah nor those besides them.

The Official Maktabatul Himmah that is under the Islamic State has said in the Introduction of Kashf ash-Shubuhaat by Shaykh Muhammad bin ‘Abdul Wahhab – may Allah have mercy on him:

“The Islamic State and its Da’wah and Jihad today, is a continuance and embodiment of the Da’wah of Tawheed and Jihad with which the Messenger of Allah – blessings of Allah and peace be upon him – and his companions came with, which was renewed by Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab and his grandsons.” End Quote.

As for the monks of evil and the dirty Sururiyyah and others besides them, who are touching the Da’wah of Shaykhul Islam Muhammad bin ‘Abdul Wahhab and his grandsons, the Official Maktabatul Himmah of the Islamic State has mentioned regarding this in the footnote of page (22) in the book ‘Masaail al-Jahiliyyah written by Shaykh Muhammad bin ‘Abdul Wahhab which they are distributing, while commenting on the saying of the Shaykh (The Eighteenth issue : Their contradiction in Attribution, they attribute themselves to Ibrahim – peace be upon him – while making their abandonment of following him apparent) :

The Maktabah al-Himmah said: “And likewise are the scholars of Al Salul who claim their attribution to the Da’wah of ash-Shaykh Muhammad bin ‘Abdul Wahhab and his grandsons – may Allah have mercy on them all -, when they do not even disbelieve in the Taghut, nor do they wage Jihad in the path of Allah, rather on the contrary they are allying themselves with the Crusaders and warring against the Mujahideen. So their likes are the likeliness of the Rawaafid who claim their attribution to ‘Ali and claim to love al-Hussain when they themselves don’t follow these two in the Tawheed, Worship, and Behaviour which they both were upon (may Allah be pleased with them both), on the contrary they act on the complete opposite of what these two were upon”. End Quote.

My Muslim brother in the Arabian Peninsula,

Indeed the matter has become apparent and become clear to full clarity, and what is after the truth except misguidance? – We seek refuge n Allah.

Indeed the methodology of the Islamic State has become clear and it is the call of pure Tawheed and Jihad upon it. And the methodology of Muhammad bin Salman is clear and it is the call of Idolatry in the Arabian Peninsula.

The issue has now become an issue between a methodology that calls to Tawheed and its spreading, and between a methodology that wish for the return of Idolatry. So what is your excuse after this? It is a matter of Belief and disbelief. So what do you wait for after this? Indeed the matter is extremely dangerous. And the world will not enrich you of the hereafter. And the evil monks and tyrants won’t be of any benefit to you.

And all Praise is to Allah, the lord of the Worlds.

Written by : Stranger of as-Sururiyyah

 

[ Shaaheen Striv3r ]

[ for other translations : justpaste.it/haqq3170 ]

The Humiliating Truce

By Shaykh Hussain bin Mahmood (May Allah preserve him)Dated : 3rd Rajab 1437H.

The truce that has occurred between the Nusayris and the “moderate” Resistance factions is not a truce as is in the known Shar’ee meaning nor as in the known customary meaning. On the contrary, it is only a great treason against the religion, thereafter a treason against the Muslims. Consecutive events have made apparent what was behind this truce – matters due to which a man would be astonished at the fact that some people could not perceive these results when it was so clear!!

“Moderate Groups” that were “vetted” by the American Defence Ministry so that it can play its role using these groups in realizing the goals of the Crusaders in the lands of Sham – these [groups] are those who are relied upon in fighting the Islamic State and other Jihadi groups. For every group that was not “vetted” or did not pass the American “vetting”, they are not moderate in the view of America, and they would be fought by America sooner or later..

Indeed from the amazing things in this war: are the terms that the enemies of Allah, (the Most High) have named their allies and their enemies with. The Russian newspapers have described Bashar as the (ذيل الكلب) “Dog’s tail”, and this dog is Putin. As for the Moderate Syrian Groups or “Vetted Syrian Opposition” its acronym in English is “VSO” and in Arabic it is (فسو) [the Arabic letters Faaf, Seen and Waw – connect to form a word which means ‘silent fart’], and I remember that I had written an old article regarding the “Sahawat of ‘Iraq” and in it I had said that they are “Faswaat” (Silent Farts) and not Sahawat (Awakening). And here is the American administration – with much appreciation – attesting to this description upon their proxies. . And they have given the acronym of “ISIS” to the Islamic State, and from the meanings of “IS” in the English language is “remaining”, and this is from the slogans of the supporters of the Islamic State: “Remaining, Remaining”. So in the language of the Disbelievers: Bashar is the “Dog’s tail”, and their moderate proxies are “silent farts”, and the Islamic State is “Remaining Remaining”. {And they plot and Allah plots [against their plots]}

As for the truce, those who are following the events would reach to a conclusion which could almost reach the level of certainty that the conspirators have agreed upon surrendering “Aleppo” to the Nusayris in exchange for the VSO’s to remain in the North West, in order to stop the Kurds from expanding who are fighting Turkey. And the only obstacle in all of this is the “Islamic State” which is being fought by all of these groups under the shadows of the American, Russian, Nusayri Jets so that they can push it away from the North West of Sham by which the stage-wise goals of the truce can be realized.

The hurtful sadness in this matter is that there may be soldiers in these groups who are sincere in their fight who wish to raise the banner of their religion. However their leaders have misguided them with these agreements and meetings from which they are earning millions of dollars when these soldiers themselves are dying for interests other than that of the religion. And we have seen some recordings of the commanders of the “Al Saud Army” which is falsely called “The Army of Islam” (Jaysh al-Islam), who were inciting the “conscience” of the commoners upon fighting the Islamic State by which that they can be safe from Bashar’s bombing. So they chose to fight the Muslims over fighting the disbelievers. What an evil view this is! And what an evil man who said it! And O’ the grief over who believes in it..

And more painful than that and more anguishing to the soul is that we see the brothers in “al-Qaeda” fighting the Islamic State along with the VSO groups!! May Allah have mercy on Usamah bin Laden who dragged America to fight in the region to deplete them, how can their successors find it in themselves to fight the Mujahideen along with groups that are funded by “Al Saud” by command and counsel of America!! What kind of succession is this for this Jihadi Shaykh,, and what kind of following is this on his views, counsel and plans!! Is it logical that the leaders of “al-Qaeda” are this naïve? Wherein they are still not able to grasp the reality of this war and the reality of the craftiness and deception in it, and the reality of these groups, and the reality of the Islamic State!! And if the problem is with the leaders of the Mujahideen, then we fear that this is a dispute over the world, and lack of sincerity. And even if what had happened earlier were Fitnas (tribulations) and infighting; the matter is much simpler, and reconciling is better, and unity is a matter from the Qur’an, and all of the goodness is in the one who first starts with the greeting of Salaam.

The Islamic State has become a current reality which doesn’t have room to be overlooked. And today, it is they who are commandeering the helm of Jihad in the world against the enemies of the religion. And it has proven itself capable of perseverance, and that it is sincere to its religion, and that it is terrifying from a perspective, and that it is the most suitable and capable among all these groups in the Islamic battlefields on leading the Muslims. So overlooking all of this is not in the interests of the Ummah. And it is upon the leaders of the Jihadi groups in the world to realize this very well because this is a historic opportunity with which they can rise up with the Ummah. And uniting the ranks of the Mujahideen today would create a military entity for the Muslims from all the way from Eastern Turkestan to Morocco. And this can be made a reality if a handful of men agree upon it today. A handful of men can unite the Mujahideen in the world and form a terrifying Military might.. These men could themselves be the reason for a calamity for the Ummah – may Allah forbid it – if they lengthened in their own temptations, and didn’t return to their senses, and didn’t bring the interest of their Ummah over their own personal interests or the interests of their groups, organizations and pieces of lands..

Whoever who can deliver these words to the individuals of the fighting groups in Sham, then let them do so, for it is from a heart full of anguish over the state of the youth of the Muslims:

 

  • Indeed, Fighting would not be a Jihad unless it is only in the path of Allah to make His Word the highest. Fighting would not be a Jihad if it is for the sake of a group, or a faction or a person or a nation, or a banner that doesn’t wish to implement the Shari’ah of Allah or goes against the belief of al-Wala wa al-Bara and the belief of love and hate for the sake of Allah, or if these obligations were made the deposit of the Referendum.
  • Fighting the Muslims: is a fitna (tribulation) and it can even be a transgression [or rebellion] .. And fighting the disbelievers, that is the Jihad in the path of Allah – which is mentioned in the Qur’an and Sunnah – if the intention is purified. So let not one of us destroy his life in a tribulation wherein his end is not known after it ends..
  • Any group that fights the Muslims under the banner of America or Russia or the apostate Kurds or the Nusayris or the Rawaafid, those are groups of disbelief and apostasy. And I do not know any difference of opinion regarding this among the Scholars of the Salaf.
  • The funding by the Arabian states to the groups is not done except by the command of America, and this is a matter that is known to everyone. So it is from the lies upon one’s own self to justify it to be aid given for the countenance of Allah, or due to an intertwinement of the same interests. This is because America doesn’t allow anything except what is in its best interest. So use your minds..
  • These Arabian states are warring against Allah and His messenger and those who believed. It was they who lit the counter-revolutions by which they killed the Muslims and ripped the honour of the Muslim women. And whoever who thought that these people have diverted from their war upon the religion, such is more misguided than the donkey in his house. Their remaining in their seats (power) is only secured by fighting against Islam.
  • Every group that America has labelled to be moderate, such is closer to apostasy. And the groups that the Americans have stamped to be VSO’s, are included in this..
  • It is not permissible according to Shari’ah to fight against the Islamic State today, especially in Aleppo. And that is because the meaning of surrendering the city of Aleppo the Nusayris means the killing of the Muslims in it and tearing apart their honour. So anyone who takes a share in distancing the Islamic State from the areas of Aleppo, such is in reality taking a share in surrendering it (Aleppo) to the Nusayris
  • It is not permissible according to Shari’ah to agree upon the humiliating truce because it is not a truce in reality. And the Russians and Nusayris have not ceased bombing the Muslims since the truce was signed. And the intention of the truce was only: to free the Nusayris and the Russians to fight the Islamic State: The Nusayris have pulled back its soldiers from the coast. And the Russians saved a lot of money and effort by concentrating bombing the areas of the Islamic State. And they employed the VSO groups to fight the Islamic State instead of using its own soldiers whom they are saving to fight the “Moderates” after repelling the Islamic State from the surroundings of Aleppo. And the Nusayris require their soldiers to consolidate the power in their desired state in the west of Sham.
  • This truce has proved that these groups have agreed upon surrendering all of the regions in the coast till Daraa to the Nusayris. And We have said – since the start of the revolution – that the Western Crusaders and the Jews wants to create a Nusayri state in the west of Sham to protect the borders of the Jews..
  • It is not permissible for one who believes in Allah and the Last Day to remain even for a single minute under a blind banner when it is able to join an Islamic banner. Indeed, the banners of Patriotism is blind, and the banner of Partisan is blind, and the banners of Nationalism is blind. This is leaving aside the banner of America that is hidden on the other side of an enslaved curtain showing the Arabian aid. All of these are blind ignorant (Jahili) banners. It is not permissible to fight under them when there is an Islamic banner.

Today, The Islamic State is the one that is most vexatious to the enemies of Allah. And it is the most infuriating for the disbelievers. And the application of Allah’s Shari’ah is apparent in its borders. And it has announced the establishment of Allah’s Shari’ah totally simply with conquering of a village or city without any reservation or delay. And the Muslims in their borders are safe except for the French, Nusayri, Arabian, Crusader bombing. And if I were to advice the brothers in these groups I would have definitely advised them to join the Islamic State. And this advice doesn’t contain in it any self-inclination or partisanship. And it is only an advice which would be asked about from the one who gave it on the Day of Judgement. And if I knew a better banner than theirs in the field, I would have advised to it without any hesitation.. And whoever refuses: then let him choose Jabhat an-Nusra, but do not obey its leaders regarding fighting the Islamic State, for “There is no obedience in a sin”

Indeed the decisive factor is in the meanings and not in the constructions. I.e. the decisive factor in the Shari’ah is based on realities and on what is happening. And it is not based on statements and terminologies. So the saying that this humiliation and this shame is a truce, such is a shameful saying which is not correct, and far removed from the reality. This is a treason in which the lands of the Muslims would be surrendered to the Nusayris by command of the Crusaders. And everyone are participants in these big meetings even if their interests differ.

And it is from the ways of playing about with the Shari’ah, that some of them say that seeking aid of Turkey is permissible. And what they mean by this is: getting the aid of turkey in Sham against the Islamic State!! And we say to them:

  1. Why are you not seeking aid from Turkey against the Nusayri’s or the Russians or the Americans or the Iranians!!
  2. Who is the one benefitting from Turkeys intervention in the war and their fight against the Islamic State!!
  3. Is this really seeking aid? Who is the one commandeering the worldwide alliance? And under which banner is Turkey fighting? Are they fighting independently or as a participant of the International Crusader Alliance?

Turkey has opened its airports to the Crusader alliance who are bombing the Muslims in ‘Iraq and Sham. So it is only a part from this alliance lead by America. The Saying that some of the groups are seeking aid from Turkey outside of this alliance is a rejected saying. The Turkish army has not ceased in announcing its secularity and their grasp on the methodology of the son of the Jewish woman ata-Turk, the enemy of Islam and the Muslims. So would a Muslim take aid from one who announces his secularity to fight those who announce their Islam and implement the Shari’ah of Allah in their lands!! (If so) what is the difference in seeking aid from Turkey compared to seeking aid from France or Britain or America!! They all announce their secular nature!!

Let those – who are misguiding the youth of the Ummah, and making them fuel for the war to realise the interests of the Crusaders, Jews, Nusayris and the Rawaafid – let them fear Allah! For this truce and these accusations against the Islamic State to be Khawaarijs at one time and at another that they are proxies, and fighting against it under the shadows of the Crusader jets, and attempting to strengthen the Nusayris over the lands of the Muslims by trying to keep the forces of the Islamic state from reaching the borders close enough to touch them, all of this points to the fact that some have sold their religion for a meagre price, and that they have paid the price of this deal with the blood and corpses of their soldiers whom they have betrayed.

It is necessary for these soldiers to consider the matter of their own selves. And it is necessary for them not to throw themselves in to destruction with their own hands. For what end awaits them: if they are not killed by the soldiers of the Islamic State today, then they would be killed by the Americans tomorrow. And they would be sold out by these leaders like how they sold their case [this matter]. . It is only one soul, and only one death. Thereafter it is either Heaven or Hell. So how would one who fights the Mujahideen meet Allah while they fight to strengthen the Nusayri’s and the Christians – the enemies of the religion – with the claim that their brothers are Khawarijs or proxies, while they know in their own selves that they are not like that and when he sees the Crusader jets passing them by overheard only to bomb the soldiers of the State after which he and his leaders proceed forward under the protection of these jets!! What kind of Jihad is this, and what sort of mind is this that has not grasped the reality still!!

So let everyone know that if Aleppo falls, then the VSO groups, those were the ones who surrendered it to the Nusayris. And they would see in the following days that the battle intensifying around Aleppo and inside it after the Nusayris secure it from the threat of the soldiers of the Islamic State. And be certain that the VSO groups would have their backs burnt.. We hold all of the fighters who participated in fighting the Islamic State responsible for what is happening in Aleppo. The matters have become clear. And the undesirable stench of the truce has started to rise above the surface of the events. And there is no excuse for anyone after these events for believing in these groups treacherous to Islam and Muslims. So let some rectify their own selves. And let them stand by their brothers in the State against this imminent danger. For the intention of the war is every Muslim. And it is not just aimed at one group or one Muslim faction leaving the others besides it.

I ask Allah the Most High to guide the people of Islam in Sham to what has goodness and benefit for the Ummah. And to unite them and join their ranks and not to test them in their religion, and to save them from the plot of the plotters and the deception of the deceivers and the treason of the treacherous…

 

And Allah knows best… May the blessings of Allah and peace be upon our prophet Muhammad, his household and his companions.

 

Written by

Hussain bin Mahmud

3 Rajab 1437H

 

[ shaaheen striv3r ]

 

[other translations : http://justpaste.it/haqq3170 ]